Our website uses cookies to improve your on-site experience. By using the website, cookies are being used as described in our Policy Document
Warning: To log in you will need to enable cookies and reload the page (Policy Document)
My ePortfolio Register   

Less-aggressive chemotherapy after initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer to be more beneficial

A study involving 5,540 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer finds that maintenance chemotherapy after initial treatment is more beneficial for patients whose disease is under control, compared with more aggressive treatment.

A maintenance strategy with a fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, such as 5-FU or capecitabine, is preferred, though observation with no chemotherapy is an acceptable option for some patients, according to the analysis of results from 12 randomised clinical trials.

The findings of this study has been published in JAMA Oncology.

"Based on these findings, switching to a lighter, maintenance regimen of chemotherapy or even taking a break in treatment for some patients is appropriate, with reintroduction of full chemotherapy when the disease progresses," said Mohamad Sonbol, M.D., a Mayo Clinic oncologist.

"The goal of therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer is to prolong life while preserving or improving quality of life. As most of these therapies are associated with side effects, it's important to use treatments that achieve a maximum benefit with the fewest side effects," added Dr Sonbol, the study's first author.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S.

At diagnosis, 1 in 4 patients will have cancer that already has spread to other organs.

Randomised controlled trials have tested different strategies for continuing chemotherapy after initial treatment, compared with less-intensive maintenance chemotherapy and observation without chemotherapy.

The results of these trials have been inconsistent, making it challenging to draw conclusions.

The Mayo Clinic study used a network meta-analysis of findings from the 12 trials to compare the treatment strategies used and the outcomes.

The analysis showed no benefit in continuing full chemotherapy until progression of the disease, compared to the other strategies.

Also, all maintenance strategies showed significant improvement in disease control - progression-free survival - compared with observation.

The investigators further compared different maintenance treatments used and found that the preferred regimen is fluoropyrimidine with or without the addition of bevacizumab, a medication used in combination with cancer-fighting drugs.

"Many chemotherapies that are used are initially beneficial in both shrinking and controlling the cancer," explained Tanios Bekaii-Saab, M.D., a Mayo Clinic gastrointestinal oncologist and the study's senior author. "However, after a few months of therapy, the maximum benefit is usually achieved and the main focus should be on how to continue that benefit while minimising side effects. This study confirms that switching to maintenance treatment is appropriate and beneficial, with introduction of full chemotherapy later upon progression of the disease."

Source: Mayo Clinic

0

Comments

Please click on the 'New Comment' link to the left to add a new comment, or alternatively click any 'Add Comment' link next to any existing post to respond. The views expressed here are not those of ecancer. For more information please view our Privacy Policy.



Founding partners

European Cancer Organisation European Institute of Oncology

Founding Charities

Foundazione Umberto Veronesi Fondazione IEO Swiss Bridge

Published by

ecancer Global Foundation